European Journal of Business Science and Technology 2025, 11(1):99-128 | DOI: 10.11118/ejobsat.2025.003

Evaluation and Simulation Methods for Ambidexterity Engineering of Digital Supply Chain Systems

Jochen Nuerk1,2, František Dařena1
1 Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic
2 SAP SE, Walldorf, Germany

Global mergers and faster business cycles create weakly harmonized supply chain (SC) systems. Industry 4.0’s smart digitalization opportunities significantly alter business model innovation rates. Consequently, the complexity of aligning value exploration and exploitation has increased, often missing the needed integration level. A holistic systems engineering (SE)-driven methodology for innovation, transformation, and optimizing smart SC systems is not available so far. Case studies at SAP SE's development organization for Industry 4.0 SCM solutions and three automotive companies explored objectives, obstacles, and methods for digital transformation. The results were synthesized into a holistic SC business model transformation and optimization methodology. Complementary to traditional SCM, the study proposes SE-driven meta-modelling to improve the performance, resilience, and synchronization of end-to-end supply chains. Moreover, holistic simulations and evaluation methods for the ambidexterity of SC business models have been developed, enhancing the effectiveness of value exploration and exploitation, and innovation productivity by holistically viewing emergence and convergence throughout SC capabilities' life cycles. Ambidexterity management and dynamic capabilities are addressed by SE methods like capability engineering and complex dynamic systems theory, integrated into a concise SE model.

Keywords: systems engineering, supply chain engineering, ambidexterity engineering
JEL classification: L21, M15, O32, O33

Received: June 26, 2024; Revised: December 16, 2024; Accepted: January 3, 2025; Published: June 30, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nuerk, J., & Dařena, F. (2025). Evaluation and Simulation Methods for Ambidexterity Engineering of Digital Supply Chain Systems. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 11(1), 99-128. doi: 10.11118/ejobsat.2025.003
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Altman, E. J. & Tushman, M. L. 2017. Platforms, Open/User Innovation, and Ecosystems: A Strategic Leadership Perspective. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper No. 17-076. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2915213 Go to original source...
    2. Arndt, F., Pierce, L. & Teece, D. J. 2018. The Behavioral and Evolutionary Roots of Dynamic Capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27 (2), 413-424. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtx042 Go to original source...
    3. Brettel, M., Greve, G. I. & Flatten, T. C. 2011. Giving up Linearity: Absorptive Capacity and Performance. Journal of Management, 13 (2), 164-189.
    4. Bryman, A. & Bell, E. 2011. Business Research Methods. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
    5. Chen, B., Wan, J., Shu, L., Li, P., Mukherjee, M. & Yin, B. 2018. Smart Factory of Industry 4.0: Key Technologies, Application Case, and Challenges. IEEE Access, 6, 6505-6519. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682 Go to original source...
    6. Chen, D. Q., Mocker, M., Preston, D. S. & Teubner, A. 2010. Information System Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 34 (2), 233-259. DOI: 10.2307/20721426 Go to original source...
    7. Childerhouse, P. & Towill, D. R. 2011. Arcs of Supply Chain Integration. International Journal of Production Research, 49 (24), 7441-7468. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.524259 Go to original source...
    8. Davey, C., Friedenthal, S., Matthews, S., Nichols, D., Nielsen, P., Oster, C., Rithle, T., Roedler, G., Schreinemakers, P., Sparks, E. & Stoewer, H. 2021. Systems Engineering Vision 2035: Engineering Solutions for a Better World. Executive Summary. INCOSE.
    9. Dumitrescu, R., Albers, A., Riedel, O., Stark, R. & Gausemeier, J. (eds.). 2021. Advanced Systems Engineering: Wertschöpfung im Wandel. Fraunhofer IEM.
    10. Godsell, J. 2008. Developing Customer Responsive Supply Chain Strategy: An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Market Segmentation and Supply Chain Strategy. PhD thesis. School of Management, Granfield University, UK.
    11. Henshaw, M. J. de C., Kemp, D., Lister, P., Daw, A. J., Harding, A. D., Farncombe, A. & Touchin, M. 2011. Capability Engineering: An Analysis of Perspectives. In 21st Annual International Symposium of the International Council on System Engineering, INCOSE 2011, pp. 707-722.
    12. Hermann, M., Pentek, T. & Otto, B. 2016. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review. In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3928-3937. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.488 Go to original source...
    13. Levy, D. L. 2000. Applications and Limitations of Complexity Theory in Organization Theory and Strategy. In Rabin, J., Miller, G. J. & Hildreth, W. B. (eds.). Handbook of Strategic Management, Chapter 3, pp. 67-87. DOI: 10.4324/9781482270259-3 Go to original source...
    14. Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K. & Hua, Z. 2013. The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility. Decision Support Systems, 54 (3), 1452-1462. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2444360 Go to original source...
    15. Makadok, R. 2001. Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (5), 387-401. DOI: 10.1002/smj.158 Go to original source...
    16. Mayring, P. A. E. 2014. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution [online]. Social Science Open Access Repository. Available at: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517
    17. Mayring, P. A. E. 2023. Qualitative Content Analysis. In Tierney, R. J., Rizvi, F. & Ercikan, K. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Education, pp. 314-322. 4th ed. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.11031-0 Go to original source...
    18. McLaren, T. S., Head, M. M., Yuan, Y. & Chan, Y. E. 2011. A Multilevel Model for Measuring the Fit Between a Firm's Competitive Strategy and Information Systems Capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 35 (4), 909-929. DOI: 10.2307/41409966 Go to original source...
    19. Mo, F., Monetti, F. M., Torayev, A., Rehman, H. U., Mulet Alberola, J. A., Rea Minango, N., Nguyen, H. N., Maffei, A. & Chaplin, J. C. 2023. A Maturity Model for the Autonomy of Manufacturing Systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 126, 405-428. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-023-10910-7 Go to original source...
    20. Nuerk, J. 2024. A Methodology for Exploiting the Value Potential of Digital Supply Chain Ecosystems with System Engineering. Dissertation thesis. Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic.
    21. Nuerk, J. & Dařena, F. 2023. Activating Supply Chain Business Models' Value Potentials through Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering, 26 (5), 660-674. DOI: 10.1002/sys.21676 Go to original source...
    22. Nuerk, J. 2019. Dynamic Alignment of Digital Supply Chain Models. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 5 (1), 41-82. DOI: 10.11118/ejobsat.v5i1.161 Go to original source...
    23. Oh, W. & Pinsonneault, A. 2007. On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and Analytical Approaches. MIS Quarterly, 31 (2), 239-265. DOI: 10.2307/25148790 Go to original source...
    24. O'Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. 2008. Abidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innventor's Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 Go to original source...
    25. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R. & Seth, N. 2006. Performance Impacts of Digitally-Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30 (2), 225-246. DOI: 10.2307/25148729 Go to original source...
    26. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. & Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organizational Science, 20 (4), 685-695. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0428 Go to original source...
    27. Rebovich, G. 2008. Enterprise System of Systems. In Jamshidi, M. (ed.). Systems of Systems Engineering: Principles and Applications, Chapter 6. DOI: 10.1201/9781420065893 Go to original source...
    28. Saberhwal, R. & Chan, Y. E. 2001. Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analysers, and Defenders. Information Systems Research, 12 (1), 11-33. DOI: 10.1287/isre.12.1.11.9714 Go to original source...
    29. Shaw, N. E., Burgess, T. F., de Mattos, C. & Stec, L. Z. 2005. Supply Chain Agility: The Influence of Industry Culture on Asset Capabilities within Capital Intensive Industries. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (16), 3497-3516. DOI: 10.1080/00207540500117805 Go to original source...
    30. Silva, L. & Hirschheim, R. 2007. Fighting against Windmills: Strategic Information Systems and Organizational Deep Structures. MIS Quarterly, 31 (2), 327-354. DOI: 10.2307/25148794 Go to original source...
    31. Spósito, M. A. F., Neto, A. C. D. & da Silva Barreto, R. 2016. Business-IT Alignment Research Field-A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, pp. 549-558. DOI: 10.5220/0005832005490558 Go to original source...
    32. Teece, D. J. 2018. Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51 (1), 40-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007 Go to original source...
    33. Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Micro-Foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319-1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640 Go to original source...
    34. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal. 18 (7), 509-533. Go to original source...
    35. van Donk, D. P. & van der Vaart, T. A. 2005. Critical Discussion on the Theoretical and Methodical Advancements in Supply Chain Integration Research. In Kotzab, H., Seuring, S., Müller, M. & Reiner, G. (eds.). Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management, pp. 31-46. DOI: 10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_3 Go to original source...
    36. Wang, R. 2011. Taxonomic Study of Agility Strategies And Supporting Supply Chain Management Practice. PhD thesis. University of Exeter.
    37. Wu, F., Yeniyurt, S., Kim, D. & Çavuşgil, S. T. 2006. The Impact of Information Technology on SC Capabilities and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based View. Industrial Marketing Management, 35 (4), 493-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.003 Go to original source...
    38. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
    39. Zott, C. & Amit, R. 2010. Business Model Design - An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning, 43 (2-3), 216-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content