European Journal of Business Science and Technology 2023, 9(2):231-248 | DOI: 10.11118/ejobsat.2023.012
Gender Differences in Career Planning among Young Adults
- 1 Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Gödöllő, Hungary
- 2 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 3 Armenian National Agrarian University, Yerevan, Armenia
- 4 Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Gender equality is the state where both men and women get equal opportunities, rights and status. Our exploratory research focuses on the situation in Armenia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia. Unlike usual researches where traditionally countries from the West and East of Europe are investigated our exploratory research focuses on countries from the Eastern Block. These countries support gender equality in the labor market; however, they contribute in strengthening the traditional family model with the length of parental leave. Based on our exploratory research we can identify patterns showing that the opinion of society about the distribution of gender roles has undergone changes in these post-socialist countries. In general, there is a common understanding about equal rights of men and women. But still, in all investigated countries, there are “traditionally” thinking people, who tend to keep the strict role-distribution of gender in child upbringing, participation of women in political and managerial matters. The results of our exploratory research can guide the human resource departments and organizations who deal with labor market in their professional orientation activities among younger generation and be a base for a future large sample research to prove the identified patterns highlighted after analyzing the sample used by the authors.
Keywords: career, education, gender equality, labor market, parental leave
JEL classification: J16, J28, J71
Received: December 16, 2022; Revised: August 23, 2023; Accepted: October 3, 2023; Published: December 31, 2023 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Act I of 2012, on the Labor Code. Government of Hungary.
- Act No. 117/1995 Coll., on State Social Support. Government of Czech Republic.
- Act No. 571/2009 Coll., on Parental Benefits and on Change of Some Norms. Government of Slovakia.
- Arar, T. & Öneren, M. 2018. Role of Talent Management in Career Development of Generation Z: A Case Study of a Telecommunication Firm. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (1), 28-44. DOI 10.9756/IAJSS/V5I1/1810004
Go to original source...
- Barone, C., Schizzerotto, A., Assirelli, G. & Abbiati, G. 2019. Nudging Gender Desegregation: Field Experiment on the Causal Effect of Information Barriers on Gender Inequalities in Higher Education. European Societies, 21 (3), 356-377. DOI 10.1080/14616696.2018.1442929
Go to original source...
- Bass, B. C. 2015. Preparing for Parenthood? Gender, Aspirations, and the Reproduction of Labor Market Inequality. Gender & Society, 29 (3), 362-385. DOI 10.1177/0891243214546936
Go to original source...
- Baltrėnas, P., Baltrėnaitė, E. & Kačerauskas, T. 2015. Social Environment of Creativity. Filosofija, Sociologija, 26 (1), 46-54.
Go to original source...
- Bohdziewicz, P. 2016. Career Anchors of Representatives of Generation Z: Some Conclusions for Managing the Younger Generation of Employees. Zarz±dzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 6 (113), 57-74.
- Breen, R. & Goldthorpe, J. H. 1997. Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory. Rationality and Society, 9 (3), 275-305. DOI 10.1177/104346397009003002
Go to original source...
- Charles, M. & Bradley, K. 2002. Equal But Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education. American Sociological Review, 67 (4), 573-599. DOI 10.2307/3088946
Go to original source...
- Charles, M. & Bradley, K. 2009. Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114 (4), 924-976. DOI 10.1086/595942
Go to original source...
- Chráska, M. 2007. Metody pedagogického výzkumu. Praha: Grada Publishing.
- Correll, S. J. 2001. Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106 (6), 1691-1730. DOI 10.1086/321299
Go to original source...
- Çineli, B. 2022. Who Manages the Money at Home? Multilevel Analysis of Couples' Money Management Across 34 Countries. Gender & Society, 36 (1), 36-62. DOI 10.1177/08912432211057920
Go to original source...
- Čermáková, M. 1995. Gender, společnost a pracovní trh. Sociologický časopis, 31 (1), 7-24. DOI 10.13060/00380288.1995.31.1.03
Go to original source...
- ČSÚ. 2019. Dávky státní sociální podpory a pěstounské péče [online]. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/90404487/19002919k3.pdf/6a083950-90a1-4423-9beb-020ee902ba29?version=1.3. [Accessed 2022, August 12].
- Dicke, A. L., Safavian, N. & Eccles, J. S. 2019. Traditional Gender Role Beliefs and Career Attainment in STEM: A Gendered Story? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1053. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01053
Go to original source...
- Ernst & Young. 2018. Next-Gen Workforce: Secret Weapon or Biggest Challenge? [online]. Available at: https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/consumer-products/consumer-products-pdfs/ey-pdf-next-gen-workforce-secret-weapon-or-biggest-challenge.pdf. [Accessed 2022, October 18].
- Fernández, M. L., Castro, Y. R., Otero, M. C., Foltz, M. L. & Lorenzo, M. G. 2006. Sexism, Vocational Goals, and Motivations as Predictors of Men's and Women's Career Choice. Sex Roles, 55, 267-272. DOI 10.1007/s11199-006-9079-y
Go to original source...
- Fodor, M. & Jäckel, K. 2018. What Does It Take to Have a Successful Career Through the Eyes of Generation Z - Based on the Results of a Primary Qualitative Research. International Journal of Lifelong Education and Leadership, 4 (1), 1-7.
- Fuchs, R. 2017. Familie und Erwerbstätigkeit 2016. Statistische Nachrichten, 10, 828-835.
- Gabay-Egozi, L., Shavit, Y. & Yaish, M. 2010. Curricular Choice: A Test of a Rational Choice Model of Education. European Sociological Review, 26 (4), 447-463. DOI 10.1093/esr/jcp031
Go to original source...
- Gabay-Egozi, L., Shavit, Y. & Yaish, M. 2015. Gender Differences in Fields of Study: The Role of Significant Others and Rational Choice Motivations. European Sociological Review, 31 (3), 284-297. DOI 10.1093/esr/jcu090
Go to original source...
- Geisberger, T. & Glaser, T. 2017. Gender Pay Gap: Analysen zum Einfluss unterschiedlicher Faktoren auf den geschlechtsspezifischen Lohnunterschied. Statistische Nachrichten, 6, 460-471.
- Glaesser, J. & Cooper, B. 2014. Using Rational Action Theory and Bourdieu's Habitus Theory Together to Account for Educational Decision-Making in England and Germany. Sociology, 48 (3), 463-481. DOI 10.1177/0038038513490352
Go to original source...
- Grow, J. M. & Yang, S. 2018. Generation Z Enters the Advertising Workplace: Expectations Through a Gendered Lens. Journal of Advertising Education, 22 (1), 7-22. DOI 10.1177/1098048218768595
Go to original source...
- Hägglund, A. E. & Lörz, M. 2020. Warum wählen Männer und Frauen unterschiedliche Studienfächer? Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 49 (1), 66-86. DOI 10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0005
Go to original source...
- Haller, M. 2001. Erklärt die Rational Choice Theorie die Ungleichheit der Bildungschancen? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 53 (3), 569-574. DOI 10.1007/s11577-001-0079-1
Go to original source...
- Hampton, D. & Welsh, D. 2019. Work Values of Generation Z Nurses. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49 (10), 480-486. DOI 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000791
Go to original source...
- Haąková, H. & Saxonberg, S. 2016. The Revenge of History - The Institutional Roots of Post-Communist Family Policy in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Social Policy & Administration, 50 (5): 559-579. DOI 10.1111/spol.12129
Go to original source...
- Jiang, X. 2020. Family Planning and Women's Educational Attainment: Evidence from the One-Child Policy. Contemporary Economic Policy, 38 (3), 530-545. DOI 10.1111/coep.12462
Go to original source...
- Jonsson, J. O. 1999. Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice: An Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model. European Sociological Review, 15 (4), 391-404. DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018272
Go to original source...
- Jung, Y. & Takeuchi, N. 2016. Gender Differences in Career Planning and Success. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31 (2), 603-623. DOI 10.1108/JMP-09-2014-0281
Go to original source...
- Larsen, K. S. & Long, E. 1988. Attitudes Toward Sex-Roles: Traditional or Egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19, 1-12. DOI 10.1007/BF00292459
Go to original source...
- Legewie, J. & DiPrete, T. A. 2014. The High School Environment and the Gender Gap in Science and Engineering. Sociology of Education, 87 (4), 259-280. DOI 10.1177/0038040714547770
Go to original source...
- Lörz, M., Schindler, S. & Walter, J. G. 2011. Gender Inequalities in Higher Education: Extent, Development and Mechanisms of Gender Differences in Enrolment and Field of Study Choice. Irish Educational Studies, 30 (2), 179-198. DOI 10.1080/03323315.2011.569139
Go to original source...
- Luhr, S. 2020. Signaling Parenthood: Managing the Motherhood Penalty and Fatherhood Premium in the U.S. Service Sector. Gender & Society, 34 (2), 259-283. DOI 10.1177/0891243220905814
Go to original source...
- Mann, A. & DiPrete, T. A. 2013. Trends in Gender Segregation in the Choice of Science and Engineering Majors. Social Science Research, 42 (6), 1519-1541. DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002
Go to original source...
- Morgan, S. L., Gelbgiser, D. & Weeden, K. A. 2013. Feeding the Pipeline: Gender, Occupational Plans, and College Major Selection. Social Science Research, 42 (4), 989-1005. DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.008
Go to original source...
- Newell, A. & Reilly, B. 2001. The Gender Pay Gap in the Transition from Communism: Some Empirical Evidence. Economic Systems, 25 (4), 287-304. DOI 10.1016/S0939-3625(01)00028-0
Go to original source...
- Ochsenfeld, F. 2016. Preferences, Constraints, and the Process of Sex Segregation in College Majors: A Choice Analysis. Social Science Research, 56, 117-132. DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.12.008
Go to original source...
- OECD. 1994. Main Definitions and Rules for the Purpose of Measuring Research and Experimental Development. Résumé Frascati Manual 1993. Paris: OECD.
- Pospíąilová, M., Jurik, N., Kříľková, A. & Cavender, G. 2020. Gender Inequalities within Copreneurships in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Czech Sociological Revue, 56 (5), 571-598. DOI 10.13060/csr.2020.041
Go to original source...
- Průcha, J. 2014. Andragogický výzkum. Praha: Grada Publishing.
- Punch, K. F. 2008. Základy kvantitativního ąetření. Praha: Portál.
- Raub, A., Nandi, A., Earle, A., de Guzmán Chorny, N., Wong, E., Chung, P., Batra, P., Schickedanz, A., Bose, B., Jou, J., Franken, D. & Heymann, J. 2018. Paid Parental Leave: A Detailed Look at Approaches Across OECD Countries. WORLD Policy Analysis Center.
- Redman, S., Saltman, D., Straton, J., Young, B. & Paul, C. 1994. Determinants of Career Choices Among Women and Men Medical Students and Interns. Medical Education, 28 (5), 361-371. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02546.x
Go to original source...
- Sutherland, J. W. 2012. Job Attribute Preferences: Who Prefers What? Employee Relations, 34 (2), 193-221. DOI 10.1108/01425451211191896
Go to original source...
- The Labour Code of the Republic of Armenia, 2004. Government of Armenia.
- Thébaud, S. & Taylor, C. J. 2021. The Specter of Motherhood: Culture and the Production of Gendered Career Aspirations in Science and Engineering. Gender & Society, 35 (3), 395-421. DOI 10.1177/08912432211006037
Go to original source...
- Waaijer, C. J. F., Sonneveld, H., Buitendijk, S. E., van Bochove, C. A. & van der Weijden, I. C. M. 2016. The Role of Gender in the Employment, Career Perception and Research Performance of Recent PhD Graduates from Dutch Universities. PLoS ONE, 11 (10), e0164784. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0164784
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.