European Journal of Business Science and Technology 2018, 4(2):126-142 | DOI: 10.11118/ejobsat.v4i2.131

Ready for Changes? The Influence of General Self-Efficacy and Resistance to Change on Managers' Future Competence Requirements

Jürgen Mühlbacher1, Tom Siebenaler1
1 Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria

With this study, we will test the interrelations between the psychological concept of self-efficacy of managers and its influences on the resistance to change. The results show that it makes a qualitative difference, if change in competences occurs in a positive or a negative direction and that there is a clear predisposition of managers concerning change. Both results have to be taken into account in designing changes processes.

Keywords: competence management, self-efficacy, resistance to change
JEL classification: M10, O10

Published: December 28, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mühlbacher, J., & Siebenaler, T. (2018). Ready for Changes? The Influence of General Self-Efficacy and Resistance to Change on Managers' Future Competence Requirements. European Journal of Business Science and Technology4(2), 126-142. doi: 10.11118/ejobsat.v4i2.131
Download citation

References

  1. Amiot, C. E., Terry, D. J., Jimmieson, N. L. and Coch, L. and French, J. R. P. 1948. Overcoming Callan, V. J. 2006. A Longitudinal Investigation of Coping Processes During a Merger: Implications for Job Satisfaction and Organizational Identification. Journal of Management, 32 (2), 552-574. Go to original source...
  2. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G. and Mossholder, K. W. 1993. Creating Readiness for Organizational Change. Human Relations, 46 (2), 681-703. Go to original source...
  3. Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84 (1), 191-215. Go to original source...
  4. Bennis, W. 1989. Managing the Dream: Leadership in the 21st Century. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2 (1), 6-10. Go to original source...
  5. Bortz, J. and Döring, N. 2006. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Go to original source...
  6. Bouckenooghe, D. 2010. Positioning Change Recipients' Attitudes Toward Change in the Organizational Change Literature. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46 (3), 500-531. Go to original source...
  7. Boyatzis, R. E. 2006. An Overview of Intentional Change from a Complexity Perspective. Journal of Management Development, 25 (3), 607-623. Go to original source...
  8. Boyatzis, R. E. and Saatcioglu, A. 2008. A 20-year View of Trying to Develop Emotional, Social and Cognitive Intelligence Competencies in Graduate Management Education. Journal of Management Development, 27 (1), 92-108. Resistance to Change. Human Relations, 1 (2), 512-532. Go to original source...
  9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. and Aiken, L. S. 2013. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Routledge. Go to original source...
  10. Cohen, G. L. and Sherman, D. K. 2014. The Psychology of Change: Self-affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65 (2), 333-371. Go to original source...
  11. Crocker, J. and Canevello, A. 2012. Self and Identity: Dynamics of Persons and Their Situations. In Deaux, K. and Snyder, M. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 263-286. Go to original source...
  12. Daft, R. L. 2014. The Leadership Experience. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
  13. Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S. and Morgeson, F. P. 2009. The Milieu of Managerial Work: An Integrative Framework Linking Work Context to Role Requirements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (4), 972-988. Go to original source...
  14. Dumont, M., Schwarzer, R. and Jerusalem, M. 2000. French Adaptation of the General SelfEfficacy Scale: Auto-efficacité généralisée [online]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Available at: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/french. [Accessed 2018, October 3].
  15. Brockner, J. and Wiesenfeld, B. M. 1996. An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120 (2), 189-208. Go to original source...
  16. Epstein, J., Santo, R. M. and Guillemin, F. 2015. A Review of Guidelines for Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Questionnaires Could Not Bring Out a Consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68 (3), 435-441. Go to original source...
  17. Bücker, J. and Poutsma, E. 2010. Global Management Competencies: A Theoretical Foundation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25 (4), 829-844. Go to original source...
  18. Caldwell, S. D., Herold, D. M. and Fedor, D. B. 2004. Toward an Understanding of the Relationships Among Organizational Change, Individual Differences, and Changes in PersonEnvironment Fit: A Cross-Level Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (3), 868-882. Go to original source...
  19. Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M. and Odman, R. B. 2011. Doing Competencies Well: Best Practices in Competency Modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64 (2), 225-262. Go to original source...
  20. Chen, G., Gully, S. M. and Eden, D. 2001. Validation of a New General Self-efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4 (1), 62-83. Go to original source...
  21. Erpenbeck, J. 2011. Der Königsweg zur Kompetenz: Grundlagen qualitativ-quantitativer Kompetenzerfassung. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
  22. Erpenbeck, J. and Heyse, V. 1999. Die Kompetenzbiographie. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
  23. Erpenbeck, J. and von Rosenstiel, L. 2003. Einführung. In Erpenbeck, J. and von Rosenstiel, L. (eds.). Handbuch Kompetenzmessung. Erkennen, verstehen und bewerten von Kompetenzen in der betrieblichen, pädagogischen und psychologischen Praxis. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, IX-XL.
  24. Festinger, L. 1957. Cognitive Dissonance Theory: Psychological Approaches. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Go to original source...
  25. Field, A. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: Sage Publications.
  26. Fischer, R. and Schwartz, S. 2011. Whence Differences in Value Priorities? Individual, Cultural, or Artifactual Sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42 (7), 1127-1144. Go to original source...
  27. Ford, J. and Collinson, D. 2011. In Search of the Perfect Manager? Work-life Balance and Managerial Work. Work, Employment and Society, 25 (3), 257-273. Go to original source...
  28. Frippiat, D. and Marquis, N. 2010. Web Surveys in the Social Sciences: An Overview. Population-E, 65 (3), 252-285. Go to original source...
  29. Giousmpasoglou, C., Marinakou, E. and Cooper, J. 2016. Chefs' Future Competencies Needs in the UK: The Stakeholders' Perspectives [online]. Dorset: Bournemouth University. Available at: http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/24935/1/abstract156.pdf. [Accessed 2018, October 3].
  30. Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B. and Caldwell, S. D. 2007. Beyond Change Management: A Multilevel Investigation of Contextual and Personal Influences on Employees' Commitment to Change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (7), 942-951. Go to original source...
  31. Heyse, V. 1997. Vorbemerkung: Ziele und Hauptaussagen der Studie. In Heyse, V. (ed.). Kundenbetreuung im Banken- und Finanzwesen - Praxisbeiträge zur Kompetenzentwicklung. Münster: Waxmann Verlag, pp. 1-11.
  32. Holt, D. T., Helfrich, C. D., Hall, C. G. and Weiner, B. J. 2010. Are You Ready? How Health Professionals Can Comprehensively Conceptualize Readiness for Change. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25 (1), 50-55. Go to original source...
  33. Hornung, S. and Rousseau, D. M. 2007. Active on the Job - Proactive in Change How Autonomy at Work Contributes to Employee Support for Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43 (3), 401-426. Go to original source...
  34. Jacobs, R. 1989. Getting the Measure of Managerial Competence. Personnel Management, 6 (1), 32-37.
  35. Judge, T. A., Erez, A. and Bono, J. E. 1998. The Power of Being Positive: The Relation Between Positive Self-concept and Job Performance. Human Performance, 11 (2), 167-187. Go to original source...
  36. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V. and Welbourne, T. M. 1999. Managerial Coping with Organizational Change: A Dispositional Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (1), 107-122. Go to original source...
  37. Lakshminarayanan, S., Pai, Y. P. and Ramaprasad, B. S. 2016. Competency Need Assessment: A Gap Analytic Approach. Industrial and Commercial Training, 48 (4), 423-430. Go to original source...
  38. Lunenburg, F. C. 2011. Leadership versus Management: A Key Distinction - at Least in Theory. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 14 (1), 1-4.
  39. £uszczyñska, A., Scholz, U. and Schwarzer, R. 2005. The General Self-efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139 (4), 439-457. Go to original source...
  40. Luxembourg for Finance and Luxembourg for Business. 2015. SurprisingLux: Look Closer for Opportunities Beyond Borders [online]. Available at: http://www.surprisinglux.com/asset/download/LFFI_SURPRISINGLUX_ENG_WEB.pdf. [Accessed 2018, October 3].
  41. McClelland, D. C. 1973. Testing for Competence Rather than for "Intelligence". American Psychologist, 28 (1), 1-14. Go to original source...
  42. Mühlbacher, J. M. 2007. Kompetenzmanagement als Grundlage strategischer Wettbewerbsvorteile. Wien: Linde Verlag.
  43. Nail, P. R., Misak, J. E., Davis, R. M. 2004. Self-affirmation versus Self-consistency: A Comparison of Two Competing Self-theories of Dissonance Phenomena. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (10), 1893-1905. Go to original source...
  44. Oreg, S. 2003. Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Differences Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), 680-693. Go to original source...
  45. Oreg, S. 2006. Personality, Context, and Resistance to Organizational Change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15 (1), 73-101. Go to original source...
  46. Oreg, S., Bayazit, M., Vakola, M., Arciniega, L. M., Armenakis, A. A., Barkauskienė, R., Bozionelos, N., Fujimoto, Y., González, L., Han, J., Høebíèková, M., Jimmieson, N., Kordaèová, J., Mitsuhashi, H., Mlaèiæ, B., Feriæ, I., Topiæ, M. K., Ohly, S., Saksvik, P. Ø., Hetland, H., Saksvik, I. and van Dam, K. 2008. Dispositional Resistance to Change: Measurement Equivalence and the Link to Personal Values Across 17 Nations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93 (4), 935-944. Go to original source...
  47. Oreg, S. and Sverdlik, N. 2011. Ambivalence toward Imposed Change: The Conflict between Dispositional Resistance to Change and the Orientation toward the Change Agent. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (3), 337-349. Go to original source...
  48. Oreg, S., Vakola, M. and Armenakis, A. 2011. Change Recipients' Reactions to Organizational Change: A 60-year Review of Quantitative Studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47 (3), 461-524. Go to original source...
  49. Oyserman, D., Elmore, K. and Smith, G. 2012. Self, Self-concept, and Identity. In Leary, M. R. and Tangney, J. P. (eds.). Handbook of Self and Identity. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 69-104.
  50. Paton, R. A. and McCalman, J. 2008. Change Management: A Guide to Effective Implementation. London: Sage Publications.
  51. Piderit, S. K. 2000. Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes toward an Organizational Change. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3), 783-794. Go to original source...
  52. Robinson, M. A., Sparrow, P. R., Clegg, C. and Birdi, K. 2007. Forecasting Future Competency Requirements: A Three-phase Methodology. Personnel Review, 36 (1), 65-90. Go to original source...
  53. Schminke, M., Cropanzano, R. and Rupp, D. E. 2002. Organization Structure and Fairness Perceptions: The Moderating Effects of Organizational Level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89 (4), 881-905. Go to original source...
  54. Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S. and Schwarzer, R. 2002. Is General Self-efficacy an Universal Construct? Psychometric Findings from 25 Countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18 (2), 242-251. Go to original source...
  55. Schwarzer, R. and Jerusalem, M. 1995. Generalized Self-efficacy Scale. In Weinmann, J., Wright, S. and Johnston, M. (eds.). Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. Windsor: Nefer-Nelson, pp. 35-37. Go to original source...
  56. Schwarzer, R. and Jerusalem, M. 1999. Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen: Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
  57. Silvia, P. J. and Gendolla, G. H. 2001. On Introspection and Self-perception: Does Self Focused Attention Enable Accurate Selfknowledge? Review of General Psychology, 5 (2), 241-269. Go to original source...
  58. Sonntag, K. and Schaper, N. 1999. Förderung beruflicher Handlungskompetenz. In Sonntag, K. (ed.). Personalentwicklung in Organisationen. Göttingen: Hogrefe, pp. 211-244.
  59. Sparrow, P. and Boam, R. 1992. Designing and Achieving Competency: A Competency-based Approach to Developing People and Organizations. London: McGraw-Hill.
  60. STATEC. 2016. Luxembourg in Figures 2016 [online]. Available at: http://www.luxembourg.public.lu/en/publications/c/statec-luxchiffres2016/index.html. [Accessed 2018, October 3].
  61. Steele, C. M. 1988. The Psychology of Self-affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21 (3), 261-302. Go to original source...
  62. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.
  63. Taylor, S. N. 2006. Why the Real Self is Fundamental to Intentional Change. Journal of Management Development, 25 (4), 643-656. Go to original source...
  64. Thewes, G. 2008. About, History of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg [online]. Luxembourg: Information and Press Service of the Government. Available at: http://www.luxembourg.public.lu/en/publications/b/ap-histoire/ap-histoire-2008-EN.pdf. [Accessed 2018, October 3].
  65. Toor, S. R. 2011. Differentiating Leadership from Management: An Empirical Investigation of Leaders and Managers. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11 (3), 310-320. Go to original source...
  66. Tripathi, K. and Agrawal, M. 2014. Competency Based Management in Organizational Context: A Literature Review. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6 (4), 349-356.
  67. Vakola, M. 2013. Multilevel Readiness to Organizational Change: A Conceptual Approach. Journal of Change Management, 13 (2), 96-109. Go to original source...
  68. Vakola, M., Oreg, S. and Armenakis, A. 2013. Reactions to Organizational Change from an Individual Differences Perspective: A Review of Empirical Research. In Oreg, S., Michel, A. and By, R. T. (eds.). The Psychology of Organizational Change: Viewing Change from the Employee's Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95-122. Go to original source...
  69. Wakslak, C. J. and Trope, Y. 2009. Cognitive Consequences of Affirming the Self: The Relationship between Self-affirmation and Object Construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (6), 927-932. Go to original source...
  70. Williams, M. N., Grajales, C. A. G. and Kurkiewicz, D. 2013. Assumptions of Multiple Regression: Correcting Two Misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 18 (1), 1-14.
  71. Woodruffe, C. 1993. What is Meant by a Competency? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 14 (1), 29-36. Go to original source...
  72. Yukl, G. and Lepsinger, R. 2005. Why Integrating the Leading and Managing Roles is Essential for Organizational Effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 34 (3), 361-375. Go to original source...
  73. Zaleznik, A. J. 1977. Managers and Leaders: Are They Different? Harvard Business Review, 55 (3), 1-9.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.